open-policy-agent / opa
- среда, 23 мая 2018 г. в 00:17:26
Go
An open source, general-purpose policy engine.
The Open Policy Agent (OPA) is an open source, general-purpose policy engine that enables unified, context-aware policy enforcement across the entire stack.
OPA is hosted by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) as a sandbox level project. If you are an organization that wants to help shape the evolution of technologies that are container-packaged, dynamically-scheduled and microservices-oriented, consider joining the CNCF. For details read the CNCF announcement.
OPA gives you a high-level declarative language to author and enforce policies across your stack.
With OPA, you define rules that govern how your system should behave. These rules exist to answer questions like:
You integrate services with OPA so that these kinds of policy decisions do not have to be hardcoded in your service. Services integrate with OPA by executing queries when policy decisions are needed.
When you query OPA for a policy decision, OPA evaluates the rules and data (which you give it) to produce an answer. The policy decision is sent back as the result of the query.
For example, in a simple API authorization use case:
The examples below show different kinds of policies you can define with OPA as well as different kinds of queries your system can execute against OPA. The example queries are executed inside OPA's REPL which was built to make it easy to develop and test policies.
For concrete examples of how to integrate OPA with systems like Kubernetes, Terraform, Docker, SSH, and more, see openpolicyagent.org.
This example shows how you can enforce access controls over salary information served by a simple HTTP API. In this example, users are allowed to access their own salary as well as the salary of anyone who reports to them.
allow {
input.method = "GET"
input.path = ["salary", id]
input.user_id = id
}
allow {
input.method = "GET"
input.path = ["salary", id]
managers = data.management_chain[id]
id = managers[_]
}
Is someone allowed to access their own salary?
> input = {"method": "GET", "path": ["salary", "bob"], "user_id": "bob"}
> allow
true
Display the management chain for Bob:
> data.management_chain["bob"]
[
"ken",
"janet"
]
Is Alice allowed to access Bob's salary?
> input = {"method": "GET", "path": ["salary", "bob"], "user_id": "alice"}
> allow
false
Is Janet allowed to access Bob's salary?
> input = {"method": "GET", "path": ["salary", "alice"], "user_id": "janet"}
> allow
true
This example shows how you can enforce where apps are deployed inside a simple orchestrator. In this example, apps must be deployed onto clusters that satisfy PCI and jurisdiction requirements.
app_placement[cluster_id] {
cluster = data.clusters[cluster_id]
satisfies_jurisdiction(input.app, cluster)
satisfies_pci(input.app, cluster)
}
satisfies_jurisdiction(app, cluster) {
not app.tags["requires-eu"]
}
satisfies_jurisdiction(app, cluster) {
app.tags["requires-eu"]
startswith(cluster.region, "eu-")
}
satisfies_pci(app, cluster) {
not app.tags["requires-pci-level"]
}
satisfies_pci(app, cluster) {
level = to_number(app.tags["requires-pci-level"])
level >= cluster.tags["pci-level"]
}
Where will this app be deployed?
> input = {"app": {"tags": {"requires-pci-level": "3", "requires-eu": "true"}}}
> app_placement
[
"prod-eu"
]
Display clusters in EU region:
> startswith(data.clusters[cluster_id].region, "eu-")
+------------+
| cluster_id |
+------------+
| "prod-eu" |
| "test-eu" |
+------------+
Display all clusters:
> data.clusters[cluster_id]
+------------+------------------------------------------------+
| cluster_id | data.clusters[cluster_id] |
+------------+------------------------------------------------+
| "prod-eu" | {"region":"eu-central","tags":{"pci-level":2}} |
| "prod-us" | {"region":"us-east"} |
| "test-eu" | {"region":"eu-west","tags":{"pci-level":4}} |
| "test-us" | {"region":"us-west"} |
+------------+------------------------------------------------+
This example shows how you can audit who has SSH access to hosts within different clusters. We will assume that SSH access is granted via group access in LDAP.
import data.ldap
import data.clusters
ssh_access[[cluster_name, host_id, user_id]] {
host_id = clusters[cluster_name].hosts[_]
group_id = ldap.users[user_id].groups[_]
group_id = clusters[cluster_name].groups[_]
}
prod_users = {user_id | ssh_access[["prod", _, user_id]]}
Who can access production hosts?
> prod_users
[
"alice",
"bob"
]
Display all LDAP users:
> data.ldap.users[user_id]
+-------------------------------+---------+
| data.ldap.users[user_id] | user_id |
+-------------------------------+---------+
| {"groups":["dev","platform"]} | "alice" |
| {"groups":["dev","ops"]} | "bob" |
| {"groups":["dev"]} | "janet" |
+-------------------------------+---------+
Display all cluster/group pairs:
> data.clusters[cluster_id].groups[_] = group_id
+------------+------------+
| cluster_id | group_id |
+------------+------------+
| "test" | "dev" |
| "test" | "ops" |
| "prod" | "ops" |
| "prod" | "platform" |
+------------+------------+
Does Janet have access to the test cluster?
> ssh_access[["test", _, "janet"]]
true
What are the addresses of the hosts in the test cluster that Janet can access?
> ssh_access[["test", host_id, "janet"]]; addr = data.hosts[host_id].addr
+------------+------------+
| addr | host_id |
+------------+------------+
| "10.0.0.1" | "host-abc" |
| "10.0.0.2" | "host-cde" |
| "10.0.0.3" | "host-efg" |
+------------+------------+
Please report vulnerabilities by email to open-policy-agent-security. We will send a confirmation message to acknowledge that we have received the report and then we will send additional messages to follow up once the issue has been investigated.