More than any other field, management is full of fluffy books that could be summarized in one 100-word article. That being said, there's a number of excellent books, listed below.
Turn the Ship Around!: A True Story of Turning Followers into Leaders
This book made me truly understand what empowering local decision means. In particular, I liked how the author explains that the usual chain of command requires information to go up the chain, and decision to go down, which is insanely inefficient.
It provides great tools for managers to help their team members come up with their own decisions, in particular the notion of deliberate action. There's a also a presentation that talks about the main concepts the author developed.
There are numerous cheesy management books and this is not one of them. The narration is great as well and the explanations are short, and to the point.
The only way for people to embrace a message is to hear it over a period of time, in a variety of different situations, and preferably from different people. That’s why great leaders see themselves as Chief Reminding Officers as much as anything else.
The best way to do cascading communication is face-to-face and live. Seeing a leader and hearing the tone of his or her voice is critical for employees, as is being able to ask a question or two.
But then again, most organizations are unhealthy precisely because they aren’t doing the basic things, which require discipline, persistence, and follow-through more than sophistication or intelligence.
📖Managing Humans: Biting and Humorous Tales of a Software Engineering Manager: "Read hilarious stories with serious lessons that Michael Lopp extracts from his varied and sometimes bizarre experiences as a manager at Apple, Pinterest, Palantir, Netscape, Symantec, Slack, and Borland. Many of the stories first appeared in primitive form in Lopp’s perennially popular blog, Rands in Repose."
📖 Oren Ellenbogen, Leading Snowflakes: the Engineering Manager Handbook: some truly great content and concrete ideas to move from maker to manager mode, code reviewing your management decisions, delegating tasks without losing quality or visibility.
📖 Andrew S. Grove, High Output Management. A landmark book by Intel CEO Andy Grove. Introduced many of the management best practices such as 1-1, OKR.
Managerial leverage measures the impact of what managers do to increase the output of their teams.
You need to plan the way a fire department plans. It cannot anticipate where the next fire will be, so it has to shape an energetic and efficient team that is capable of responding to the unanticipated as well as to any ordinary event.
Every hour of your day should be spent increasing the output or the value of the output of the people whom you’re responsible for.
A common rule we should always try to heed is to detect and fix any problem in a production process at the lowest-value stage possible.
A genuinely effective indicator will cover the output of the work unit and not simply the activity involved. Obviously, you measure a salesman by the orders he gets (output), not by the calls he makes (activity).
A manager’s output = The output of his organization + The output of the neighboring organizations under his influence.
League standings are kept by team, not by individual. Business—and this means not just the business of commerce but the business of education, the business of government, the business of medicine—is a team activity. And, always, it takes a team to win.
Your decision-making depends finally on how well you comprehend the facts and issues facing your business. This is why information-gathering is so important in a manager’s life.
The lack of a decision is the same as a negative decision; no green light is a red light, and work can stop for a whole organization.
Delegation without follow-through is abdication.
Any decision be worked out and reached at the lowest competent level. The reason is that this is where it will be made by people who are closest to the situation and know the most about it.
Self-confidence mostly comes from a gut-level realization that nobody has ever died from making a wrong business decision, or taking inappropriate action, or being overruled.
A successful MBO [management by objective] system needs only to answer two questions: 1. Where do I want to go? (The answer provides the objective.) 2. How will I pace myself to see if I am getting there? (The answer gives us milestones, or key results).
The one thing an MBO system should provide par excellence is focus. This can only happen if we keep the number of objectives small. In practice, this is rare, and here, as elsewhere, we fall victim to our inability to say “no”—in this case, to too many objectives. We must realize—and act on the realization—that if we try to focus on everything, we focus on nothing. A few extremely well-chosen objectives impart a clear message about what we say “yes” to and what we say “no” to—which is what we must have if an MBO system is to work.
Alfred Sloan summed up decades of experience at General Motors by saying, “Good management rests on a reconciliation of centralization and decentralization.” Or, we might say, on a balancing act to get the best combination of responsiveness and leverage.
I would like to propose Grove’s Law: All large organizations with a common business purpose end up in a hybrid organizational form.
When a person is not doing his job, there can only be two reasons for it. The person either can’t do it or won’t do it; he is either not capable or not motivated.
That variable is the task-relevant maturity (TRM) of the subordinates, which is a combination of the degree of their achievement orientation and readiness to take responsibility, as well as their education, training, and experience.
When the TRM is low, the most effective approach is one that offers very precise and detailed instructions, wherein the supervisor tells the subordinate what needs to be done, when, and how: in other words, a highly structured approach. As the TRM of the subordinate grows, the most effective style moves from the structured to one more given to communication, emotional support, and encouragement.
The responsibility for teaching the subordinate must be assumed by his supervisor, and not paid for by the customers of his organization, internal or external.
At all times you should force yourself to assess performance, not potential.
A manager generally has two ways to raise the level of individual performance of his subordinates: by increasing motivation, the desire of each person to do his job well, and by increasing individual capability, which is where training comes in.
📖 Work Rules!: Insights from Inside Google That Will Transform How You Live and Lead, Laszlo Bock. A pretty interesting description of Google's processes. A bit long at times.
📖The Manager's Path , Camille Fournier. A very practical book with lots of down-to-earth advices.
There are some other more specific books quoted below.
Lars Dalgaard, Thoughts on Building Weatherproof Companies: while originally aimed at startups CEOs, this article from Andreessen Horowitz's blog is a very inspiring read on what it takes to scale your team.
Hire motivated people. Trust them. Set high standards for everything. Lead by example. Get out of their way and let them be the heroes of the day. That’s it.
Mistakes of the First Twenty-five Years, in which Warren Buffet describes the "institutional imperative", or how an institution will amplify (not resist) a bad manager's irrational decisions.
This is a list of inspiring articles related to engineering management. Those are usually short and concise articles that are packed with inspiring and concrete ideas. They have shaped my own management practice, and I hope they will inspire you as well.
I don't necessarily agree with everything listed here. Actually, you'll see that some of those articles have diametrically opposed opinions. I do believe those thought-provoking resources will help you in your manager journey.
How would you like to grow within this organization?
Do you feel a sense of purpose in your job?
What do you need from me to do your best work?
What are we currently not doing as a company that you feel we should do?
Do you have the opportunity to do what you do best every day?
Antipatterns
Seven Deadly Diseases of Management, Dr. Deming. Great video as well. I don't necessarily agree with everything but Deming is still one of the great management thinker.
Biases
📖Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman and published in 2012 is already a classic. It offers a whirling tour into our biases and the limits of human judgment. Truly amazing read.
The following prompts jostle you out of tiny thinking
If you were forced to increase your prices by 10x, what would you have to do to justify it?
If all our customers vanished, and we had to earn our growth and brand from scratch, what would we do?
If you were never allowed to provide tech support, in any form, what would have to change?
If our biggest competitor copied every single feature we have, how do we still win?
What if we are forced to ship a full, completed (at least MVP) new feature, in just two weeks, that would delight and surprise some fraction of our customers.
What if you were forced to charge customers in a completely different manner?
No more synchronous meetings, ever again?
If we could never talk to our customers again, how would we figure out what to build?
What if it didn’t matter how unprofitable you were?
What externality has the potential to kill the entire company?
The dangerous man is the one who has only one idea, because then he’ll fight and die for it. The way real science goes is that you come up with lots of ideas, and most of them will be wrong.
— Francis Crick
Career growth and job ladder
Titles are Toxic, Rands in Repose. A pretty interesting take on titles.
I’ve chosen to cultivate a path for myself that enables me to dig into complex technical and product problem spaces and help lead technical and strategic direction for my organization, as an engineer but not a manager.
Nobody enjoys writing and maintaining data pipelines or ETL. It’s the industry’s ultimate hot potato.
Give data scientists ownership of the ETL end-to-end
Engineers design new Lego blocks that data scientists assemble in creative ways to create new data science.
It is absolutely essential for platform engineers to stay ahead of the data science teams
Engineers should see themselves as being “Tony Stark’s tailor”, building the armor that prevents data scientists from falling into pitfalls that yield unscalable or unreliable solutions.
We [should be ok with] sacrificing technical efficiency for velocity and autonomy
Tools for better thinking: Situation-Behavior-Impact, conflict resolution diagram, Ishikawa diagram, Einsenhower matrix, second order thinking, decision matrix, etc.
Arguments you should avoid using - that are logical fallacies
“Because it’s always been done this way.”
“Because we tried it before, and it didn’t work.”
“Because company X uses this.”
“Because {important person} said so.”
Reason on tradeoffs, constraints, opportunities instead.
Against micromanagement: "After you plant a seed in the ground, you don’t dig it up every week to see how it is doing", William Coyne, Head of R&D at 3M.
The 70/10/80 Principle of delegation: “Find someone who can do what you do at 70% the success rate. Teach them the extra 10% and be okay with 80%.”
Most men believe that they have no biases against women and that the organizations in which they work treat women and men equally. If senior-level men read this book, they will realize that neither of these beliefs is correct.
Project Include: an open community working toward providing meaningful diversity and inclusion solutions for tech companies. A great resource for anything diversity-related.
Durable improvements depend on creating systems that create changes, not performing tactical actions that create the ephemeral appearance of improvement.
Figure out if something is really wrong and needs immediate attention.
Shadow customer meetings, partner meetings or user testing.
Find your business analytics and how to query them.
Shadow existing interviews, onboarding and closing calls.
So the first step to achieving the results we really want is to fix the problem of believing that others are the source of all that ails us. It’s our dogmatic conviction that “if we could just fix those losers, all would go better” that keeps us from taking action that could lead to dialogue and progress. Which is why it’s no surprise that those who are best at dialogue tend to turn this logic around. They believe the best way to work on “us” is to start with “me.”
Respect is like air. As long as it’s present, nobody thinks about it. But if you take it away, it’s all that people can think about.
“One dull pencil is worth six sharp minds.” Don’t leave your hard work to memory. If you’ve gone to the effort to complete a crucial conversation, don’t fritter away all the meaning you created by trusting your memories. Write down the details of conclusions, decisions, and assignments.
Firing people: Zach Holman's talk about his experience being fired from Github offers some great insights into a process that is rarely talked about.
We met once a month, sat around a table, and shared feedback with each other in front of our other teammates. This gathering took feedback exchange from being a biannual activity we dreaded to a monthly ritual we looked forward to.
Targets are great. But how targets are reached matters too. A team that would meet its target two months later should be rewarded more than a team that reach its target at the expense of morale and quality.
SEALs measure performance and trust. They would rather have a medium performance high trust person on the team than a high performance low trust person.
Simon's team runs team peer reviews. One person shares their top three weaknesses, the team can comment but they can only say thank you, then they do the same for their strength.
Train your interview team to apply a limited-consensus approach to hiring. When groups use limited consensus, not everyone may agree with the decision, but each person should be satisfied enough with a particular candidate’s suitability not to block the decision to hire him or her.
What if the vetoer is someone I don’t want to keep in the organization?” The answer to this is simple: In the interview process, only involve employees whose work you respect and value. If an employee isn’t successful in his or her technical position, don’t make that employee part of the interview team.
Make sure members of your team interview an internal candidate the same way they would interview an external candidate.
Know why you’re hiring more people. Define your problems to define your hiring strategy.
Sometimes, the main reason a hiring manager doesn’t hire a candidate is that he or she has a gut feeling that the person just won’t fit well with the culture. But a “gut feeling” is not a good reason not to hire someone, so train yourself to articulate culture-fit differences.
I personally do not consider certification to mean anything much when I am hiring someone for a technical position. Because the knowledge tested is functional-skills book knowledge, make sure you understand what the person must do to maintain his or her certification and the value of that certification to your environment.
Too often, internal recruiters look for tool and technology expertise or for advanced academic degrees, rather than for functional skill or for product-domain experience.
If you feel the need to take notes, take them on paper, never on a computer. My reason for this is that when you use a computer, you have to sit behind a screen, which creates a barrier between you and the candidate.
Promising an unconditional promotion is not just risky; it is stupid. Circumstances within the company can change; the employee may not perform up to expectations; the economy may tank.
Sue Tetzlaff, The Employee Experience: A Capstone Guide to Peak Performance
I am convinced that nothing we do is more important than hiring and developing people. At the end of the day you bet on people, not on strategies.
Lawrence Bossidy, GE
I hire people brighter than me and then I get out of their way.
Lee Iacocca, Ford
You can dream, create, design and build the most wonderful place in the world... but it requires people to make the dream a reality.
Walt Disney
Hire character. Train skill.
Peter Schutz, Porsche
In technology, it's about the people. Getting the best people, retaining them, nurturing a creative environment, and helping to find a way to innovate.
Marissa Mayer
I'd rather interview 50 people and not hire anyone than hire the wrong person.
Jeff Bezos
Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence win championships.
Michael Jordan, American former professional basketball player
Often the best solution to a management problem is the right person.
Edwin Booz
Somebody once said that in looking for people to hire, you look for three qualities: integrity, intelligence, and energy. And if you don't have the first, the other two will kill you. You think about it; it's true. If you hire somebody without [integrity], you really want them to be dumb and lazy.
Warren Buffet
One cannot hire a hand; the whole man always comes with it.
Peter Drucker
If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur.
Red Adair
Incident prevention and response (on-call, outages)
A great description of what blamelessness actually means: How is team-member-1 doing? (team-member-1 is the name of the person that "gave the unfortunate command to delete our primary database" during the global Gitlab outage in Feb 2017.
Your first responsibility as a manager is to manage yourself: your integrity, character, ethics, knowledge, wisdom, temperament, words and acts.
The second responsibility is to manage those who have authority over us.
The third responsibility is to manage your peers: without their respect and confidence, nothing can be accomplished.
The fourth responsibility is to manage those whom we have authority.
You can't manage your bosses, peers, regulators etc. But you can understand them, motivate them, influence them, forgive them.
"It is from failure that amazing growth and grace so often come, provided only that one can recognise it, admit it, learn from it, rise above it, and try again. True leadership presumes a standard quite beyond human perfectibility and that is quite alright, for joy and satisfaction are in the pursuit of an objective, not in its realization."
Transparency and accountability via weekly, written updates
Quote:
"If you want to build a ship, don't drum up people to collect wood and don't assign them tasks and work, but rather teach them to long for the endless immensity of the sea.", Antoine de Saint-Exupery
"Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things.", Peter Drucker
Meetings
On Better Meetings: Lara Hogan shares tips about ensuring efficient meetings.
The two-factor theory (Wikipedia) "states that there are certain factors in the workplace that cause job satisfaction, while a separate set of factors cause dissatisfaction."
The most important function of a VP of engineering is to build out the engineering team and set a startup’s engineering culture.
Competent engineering management should therefore be able to push the team towards more practical, incremental designs that can garner useful external feedback quickly — without compromising the long-term generality of the system. The VP’s role here is not producing the architecture, but ensuring that incremental release is a real requirement in the design process.
Strong engineering management tends to give their teams enough ownership and latitude that they are happy and fulfilled in driving the product forward.
Engineering managers in this model had little responsibility beyond the career development of the people they managed.
There was no single person accountable for the engineering team’s delivery or who could negotiate prioritization of work at an equivalent level of responsibility.
Autonomy requires alignment. Company priorities must be defined by leadership. Autonomy does not mean teams get to do whatever they want.
Business units, departments, teams, and managers more effectively communicate organization structure roles and responsibilities than Spotify’s synonyms and are not attached to a way of working that failed their creator.
Every autonomous team is expected to generate direct business value all by itself, without a lot of overlap with other teams.
The team should be able to meets its goals independently (i.e. without reliance on or interference from other teams).
Coordination, also known as alignment, communication, shared roadmap, Gantt chart and many other positive sounding names, is the arch-enemy of the autonomous team.
There should be no shared ownership of components, libraries, or code.
If you have microservices but are still waiting to do end-to-end testing of a combination of services, you have a distributed monolith (a distributed monolith is when all changes in a service require updates to other services).
Use software boundaries defined by business-domain bounded contexts
Teams composed of only people with single functional expertise should be avoided at all costs.
Four fundamental team topologies: stream-aligned, enabling, complicated subsystem, platform.
BAPO: the B (business) should define the A (architecture) which is the starting point for the P (process), on which the O (organization) is based.
Most companies are not BAPO but instead they are OPAB: the existing organization is used as a basis for the definition of convenience-driven processes, which in turn leads to an accidental architecture.
Research shows that it takes as long as 30 minutes for makers to get into the flow
Use maker-manager office hours
Communication can happen at a quieter asynchronous frequency in the form of thoughtful, written discussions rather than soul-sucking meetings or erratic one-line-at-a-time chat messages
Build a team knowledge base to minimize repetitive questions and allow self-onboarding.
In terms of software, I can't recommend Things enough (Mac and iOS only). It is a delightful piece of software that gets out of the way and lets you focus on your tasks.
With constant innovation, new market entrants and potential black swans like a global pandemic, the best a leader can do is set a 12–18 month strategic plan that is directionally aligned with the company’s true north. That plan should be broken down by quarter with the assumption that the degree of confidence in achieving goals within each quarter will decline over time.
Expect each team across the organization to cascade their operational roadmaps from these strategic foci. Operational roadmaps should identify key initiatives and milestones.
Sand: Prioritize with intuition and desire, not math and metrics
Self-managed teams schedule their own Sand
Pebbles maximize ROI
Beware the surprisingly high impact of estimation error on ROI
Truth emerges more readily from error than from confusion.
Francis Bacon
Goals
With Goals, FAST Beats SMART: goals should be embedded in frequent discussions; ambitious in scope; measured by specific metrics and milestones; and transparent for everyone in the organization to see.
A goal without a plan is just a wish.
Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
📖The Non-Designer's Design Book - despite its clickbait title, it's actually a great book with a very memorable acronym to learn about how easy it is to design great documents.
📖The Mythical Man-Month by Frederick Brooks is a classical book about software project management.
Now I do not think software managers have less inherent courage and firmness than chefs, nor than other engineering managers. But false scheduling to match the patron's desired date is much more common in our discipline than elsewhere in engineering.
The boss must first distinguish between action information and status information. He must discipline himself not to act on problems his managers can solve.
Jason Yip, It's Not Just Standing Up: Patterns for Daily Standup Meetings: standup are a pretty controversial topics. This article on Martin Fowler's blog provides a good list of patterns and anti-patterns to ensure they're a good productive use of everybody's time.
People are going to cut corners if you put them to tough deadlines.
No one is going to experiment with new ways of doing things if you fetishize finishing under deadlines. We'd still be doing MVC in frontend apps if someone at Facebook didn't miss a deadline.
Have deadlines, but fuzzy. How fuzzy should be decided by your goals. If missing a deadline could potentially lose you a million dollars, the fuzziness factor for that should be zero.
Help the team focus - and don't be afraid to delegate
The article includes a short checklist for first-time project managers: kickoff meeting, milestones, design process, weekly update emails, daily standups, weekly goals, demoing progress.
The reason why this [forcing people to focus and work on only one important problem] was such a successful strategy is that most people tend to substitute from A+ problems that are very difficult to solve to B+ problems for which they already know a solution to.
Letter to Shareholders, Jeff Bezos: “Day 2 is stasis. Followed by irrelevance. Followed by excruciating, painful decline. Followed by death. And that is why it is always Day 1.” So much is packed in this letter. Day 1 is about true customer obsession, resisting proxies, embracing external trends, high-velocity decision making.
Never introduce a new programming language in an existing code-base because of personal preference. Building software is a team effort. Globalize your code languages. Team cohesion is what matters the most.
You must have production experience in the programming language you want to replace or complement with another one
A decision to introduce a new programming language must be based on non-functional requirements, measurements or other relevant arguments, and not personal opinions.
Always think about the team and company, and especially about hiring and expanding the team.
A programming language is just a tool to deliver software. Don’t be in a tight relationship with your screwdriver.
Can Do Vs Must Do , AVC. "Doing a startup is like playing a video game. Each level requires you to master one thing and once you do that, you level up and then there is a new thing to master."
"Waterline principle" from Bill Gore: "Think of being on a ship, and imagine that any decision gone bad will blow a hole in the side of the ship. If you blow a hole above the waterline (where the ship won’t take on water and possibly sink), you can patch the hole, learn from the experience, and sail on. But if you blow a hole below the waterline, you can find yourself facing gushers of water pouring in, pulling you toward the ocean floor. And if it’s a big enough hole, you might go down really fast, just like some of the financial firm catastrophes of 2008. To be clear, great enterprises do make big bets, but they avoid big bets that could blow holes below the waterline.", How We Might Fall.
Your direct report sends you something they consider worth sharing with you (can be a blog post, book chapter, video, podcast…) and a few related questions they have in mind a few days before you meet together.
On the D day, you share your opinion about it and try to answer the questions that go with it.
People often think they don’t like management training. But what they’re really saying is “I don’t like shitty management training.”
Mistake: only training new managers
Snacks are good for the kitchen. They’re less useful for leadership lessons.
4 topics every manager training should include:
Goal setting
Talent management
Org planning
Leadership & culture development
Work ethics & work/life balance
The Virtues of Laziness and Impatience: "there are two areas I encourage you to practice showing, right now: figuring out what’s important, and going home."
Lazy Leadership: "entrepreneurship is really just a fancy word for delegation".
Useful writing tells people something true and important that they didn't already know, and tells them as unequivocally as possible.
Translated into essay writing, what this means is that if you write a bad sentence, you don't publish it. You delete it and try again. Often you abandon whole branches of four or five paragraphs. Sometimes a whole essay.
Importance + novelty + correctness + strength, is the recipe for a good essay
If you want to design something attractive, you have to add an axis to your creative process. You have to make the ideas simple and universal at the same time.
Netflix's Chef's table profiles a couple world-renown chef. The kitchen world bears a lot of similarities with management. In the season two, I especially recommend episode 1 and 3:
Alex Atala's story shows that you need to constantly reinvent and disrupt yourself.
Dominique Crenn explains how she was given ownership over her work in her first kitchen experience (where she was basically given just a dish name, a list of ingredients, and was expected to invent the recipe with no kitchen training). She replicated that in her own kitchen.
The Office is a great satire of a dysfunctioning office.
Keeping up-to-date: blogs and newsletters
Here are some blogs and newsletter I follow.
Newsletter
Software Lead Weekly (Oren Ellenbogen): a short curation of great management articles. Also include some videos, and some less serious, funny material. A lot of the links founds in this repo appeared in Oren's weekly email.
Hacker News: mandatory if you want to stay abreast of what's going in tech. There are some good management articles from time to time as well. Since it can be a pretty huge time sink, I subscribe to a curation of the top articles instead (RSS feed here).
Podcast
FRICTION with Bob Sutton. This podcast does not have any new episode since 2017, but it has some really great content. Great conversations. Lots of stories.
Part organizational design. Part therapy. Organizational psychologist and Stanford Professor Bob Sutton is back to tackle friction, the phenomenon that frustrates employees, fatigues teams and causes organizations to flounder and fail.