benjamn / reify
- понедельник, 20 июня 2016 г. в 03:12:29
JavaScript
Enable ECMAScript 2015 modules in Node today. No caveats. Full stop.
re•i•fied past re•i•fies present re•i•fy•ing participle re•i•fi•ca•tion noun re•i•fi•er noun
npm install --save reify
in your package or app directory. The
--save
is important because reification only applies to modules in
packages that explicitly depend on the reify
package.require("reify")
before importing modules that contain import
and export
declarations.You can also easily reify
the Node REPL:
% node
> require("reify/repl")
{}
> import { strictEqual } from "assert"
> strictEqual(2 + 2, 5)
AssertionError: 4 === 5
at repl:1:1
at REPLServer.defaultEval (repl.js:272:27)
...
Code generated by the reify
compiler relies on a simple runtime
API that can be explained through a series of
examples. While you do not have to write this API by hand, it is designed
to be easily human readable and writable, in part because that makes it
easier to explain.
I will explain the Module.prototype.import
method first, then the
Module.prototype.export
method after that. Note that this Module
is
the constructor of the CommonJS module
object, and the import
and
export
methods are custom additions to Module.prototype
.
module.import(id, setters)
Here we go:
import a, { b, c as d } from "./module";
becomes
// Local symbols are declared as ordinary variables.
let a, b, d;
module.import("./module", {
// The keys of this object literal are the names of exported symbols.
// The values are setter functions that take new values and update the
// local variables.
default: value => { a = value; },
b: value => { b = value; },
c: value => { d = value; },
});
All setter functions are called synchronously before module.import
returns, with whatever values are immediately available. However, when
there are import cycles, some setter functions may be called again, when
the exported values change. Calling these setter functions one or more
times is the key to implementing live
bindings, as
required by the ECMAScript 2015 specification.
While most setter functions only need to know the value of the exported
symbol, the name of the symbol is also provided as a second parameter
after the value. This parameter becomes important for *
imports (and *
exports, but we'll get to that a bit later):
import * as utils from "./utils";
becomes
let utils = {};
module.import("./utils", {
"*": (value, name) => {
utils[name] = value;
}
});
The setter function for *
imports is called once for each symbol name
exported from the "./utils"
module. If any individual value happens to
change after the call to module.import
, the setter function will be
called again to update that particular value. This approach ensures that
the actual exports
object is never exposed to the caller of
module.import
.
Notice that this compilation strategy works equally well no matter where
the import
declaration appears:
if (condition) {
import { a as b } from "./c";
console.log(b);
}
becomes
if (condition) {
let b;
module.import("./c", {
a: value => { b = value; }
});
console.log(b);
}
See WHY_NEST_IMPORTS.md
for a much more detailed
discussion of why nested import
declarations are worthwhile.
module.export(getters)
What about export
declarations? One option would be to transform them into
CommonJS code that updates the exports
object, since interoperability
with Node and CommonJS is certainly a goal of this approach.
However, if Module.prototype.import
takes a module identifier and a map
of setter functions, then it seems natural to have a
Module.prototype.export
method that registers getter functions. Given
these getter functions, whenever module.import(id, ...)
is called by a
parent module, the getters for the id
module will run, updating its
module.exports
object, so that the module.import
method has access to
the latest exported values.
The module.export
method is called with a single object literal whose
keys are exported symbol names and whose values are getter functions for
those exported symbols. So, for example,
export const a = "a", b = "b", ...;
becomes
module.export({
a: () => a,
b: () => b,
...
});
const a = "a", b = "b", ...;
This code registers getter functions for the variables a
, b
, ..., so
that module.import
can easily retrieve the latest values of those
variables at any time. It's important that we register getter functions
rather than storing computed values, so that other modules always can
import the newest values.
Export remapping works, too:
let c = 123;
export { c as see }
becomes
module.export({ see: () => c });
let c = 123;
Note that the module.export
call is "hoisted" to the top of the block
where it appears. This is safe because the getter functions work equally
well anywhere in the scope where the exported variable is declared, and
important to ensure getters are registered as early as possible.
What about export default
declarations? It would be a mistake to defer
evaluation of the default
expression until later, so wrapping it in a
getter function is not exactly what we want.
The important point to understand here is that module.import
does not
assume a getter function has been registered by module.export
for every
imported symbol. Instead, parentModule.import
only really cares about
the contents of childModule.exports
. While the childModule.export
method helps keep childModule.exports
up to date, that level of
sophistication isn't strictly necessary in every situation, and default
exports are one such situation:
export default getDefault();
simply becomes
exports.default = getDefault();
module.runModuleSetters()
Now, suppose you change the value of an exported local variable after the
module has finished loading. Then you need to let the module system know
about the update, and that's where module.runModuleSetters
comes in. The
module system calls this method on your behalf whenever a module finishes
loading, but you can also call it manually, or simply let reify
generate
code that calls module.runModuleSetters
for you whenever you assign to
an exported local variable.
Calling module.runModuleSetters()
with no arguments causes any setters
that depend on the current module to be rerun, but only if the value a
setter would receive is different from the last value passed to the
setter.
If you pass an argument to module.runModuleSetters
, the value of that
argument will be returned as-is, so that you can easily wrap assignment
expressions with calls to module.runModuleSetters
:
export let value = 0;
export function increment(by) {
return value += by;
};
should become
module.export({
value: () => value,
increment: () => increment,
});
let value = 0;
function increment(by) {
return module.runModuleSetters(value += by);
};
Note that module.runModuleSetters(argument)
does not actually use
argument
. However, by having module.runModuleSetters(argument)
return
argument
unmodified, we can run setters immediately after the assignment
without interfering with evaluation of the larger expression.
Because module.runModuleSetters
runs any setters that have new values,
it's also useful for potentially risky expressions that are difficult to
analyze statically:
export let value = 0;
function runCommand(command) {
// This picks up any new values of any exported local variables that may
// have been modified by eval.
return module.runModuleSetters(eval(command));
}
runCommand("value = 1234");
export
s that are really import
sWhat about export ... from "./module"
declarations? The key insight here
is that export
declarations with a from "..."
clause are really just
import
declarations that update the exports
object instead of updating
local variables:
export { a, b as c } from "./module";
becomes
module.import("./module", {
a: value => { exports.a = value; },
b: value => { exports.c = value; },
});
This strategy cleanly generalizes to export * from "..."
declarations:
export * from "./module";
becomes
module.import("./module", {
"*": (value, name) => {
exports[name] = value;
}
});
While these examples have not covered every possible syntax for import
and export
declarations, I hope they provide the intuition necessary to
imagine how any declaration could be compiled.
When I have some time, I hope to implement a live-compiling text editor to enable experimentation.